Don’t Fall for This Common Health Myth About Long-Term Health
The conversation around health often centers on personal choices—diet, fitness, and wellness routines. Yet, Devi Sridhar, a global public health expert, believes that this approach is misguided. In her latest book, “How Not to Die (Too Soon),” Sridhar argues that the biggest factor in long-term health isn’t kale smoothies or 10K runs—it’s government policy.
She makes a compelling case that the most effective health measures—clean water, air quality, road safety, and access to care—come not from individual habits, but from public systems designed to support well-being on a national scale.
What Truly Shapes Long-Term Health?
Sridhar doesn’t reject the idea of individual effort. She agrees that healthy choices matter—but only when people have the tools and conditions to make them. “If you have time, money, and education, personal health steps can work,” she explained. “But it’s unrealistic to place the entire responsibility on individuals when so much depends on where you live and your access to basic services.”
She emphasizes how environmental and social structures directly shape outcomes. In low-income areas, people often face polluted air, unsafe neighborhoods, or unaffordable healthcare. These barriers make it harder to reach the same health goals, no matter how strong the personal motivation may be.
Freepik | Devi Sridhar explains how health depends more on where you live than just what you do.
Why the Self-Help Model Took Over
So how did the world fall for the myth of self-powered health? According to Sridhar, people crave control. Many prefer the idea that their outcomes lie in their own hands rather than in messy political systems. Wellness marketing taps into that belief perfectly—offering a path that feels empowering.
“We’re surrounded by influencers and self-help content telling us to do more, eat better, sleep deeper,” Sridhar said. “And when we’re not exposed to structural health messaging as often, it fades into the background.”
People tune out public health because it feels distant. Politicians appear untrustworthy, and the long-term benefits of policy can feel invisible. Meanwhile, a new protein bar or detox cleanse promises immediate change—and gets more attention online.
When Personal Choices Fall Short
While individual actions matter, some threats simply can’t be managed alone. Air pollution, for instance, affects everyone regardless of personal fitness routines. Water quality, road safety, and hospital access all lie outside the realm of personal control.
This is where public health steps in. Governments build the infrastructure that helps people to live longer and healthier lives. Without regulations or investments in clean environments, the odds are stacked—even against the most disciplined individuals.
Celebrity Wellness vs. Public Truth
Social media often tilts the health conversation toward personality-driven content. Influencers promote diets, routines, and supplements, building massive followings. Yet many lack any scientific background. Popularity, not accuracy, drives reach.
Sridhar pointed to a well-known podcast host who recently downplayed the risks of measles. “He’s not a doctor. But people listen to him more than they do to official health agencies,” she noted.
This misinformation thrives in a system where quick, viral content overshadows evidence. Even outrageous claims—like alcohol as a life-extending hack—can draw millions of views. In contrast, accurate messages about vaccines or health equity often struggle to break through.
The Struggle of Promoting Public Health
Public health rarely feels marketable. Its goals don’t come in sleek packaging or influencer campaigns. During the pandemic, many began viewing health regulations as restrictive, rather than protective. That perception has lingered.
Sridhar believes messaging needs a reset. “Don’t just say it’s good for the planet or society. Show how it makes life easier,” she said. She suggests shifting the narrative to benefits people can feel—less traffic stress, fewer hospital bills, cleaner neighborhoods.
Even then, policy shifts face resistance. Yet history shows that people eventually adapt. Take smoking bans in public places or mandatory seatbelts—both were unpopular at first but became standard practice.
When Governments Step In and Win
Instagram | @profdevisridhar | Devi Sridhar points to bold policies like UK gun reform to show how governments can protect lives.
Sridhar highlighted powerful examples of successful policy. One case stands out—the gun reforms enacted after the 1996 Dunblane school shooting in Scotland. Despite initial pushback, the measures led to decades without a single mass shooting in British schools.
It’s proof that even controversial policies can save lives when implemented with persistence and backed by public support. And it shows that collective safety doesn’t always require endless compromise—it sometimes just requires bold decisions.
Balancing Individual Effort and Public Duty
While personal action plays a role, it thrives when governments set the stage for success. Think of personal health as a solo sprint, but public policy as the track that makes the sprint possible. Without that support, the finish line moves further away.
Sridhar argues that for real change, both sides must work in tandem. People need access and opportunity, while governments must ensure fair conditions and uphold evidence-based standards.
That balance can’t be found in a TikTok workout or a miracle supplement. It starts with recognizing where health truly begins—in the laws, investments, and systems that shape daily life.
Building a healthier future requires more than willpower—it demands smart policy. Real progress comes when governments prioritize people’s well-being and when society values structural solutions as much as individual strength. The sooner that shift happens, the better everyone’s odds of living well—and longer.